Review procedure

The review process is conducted anonymously by in two rounds.

In the first round, the articles offered are evaluated by a minimum of 2 reviewers according to uniform criteria, compiled in a table (see below), with the possibility to comment verbally. The reviewers choose from four options, namely, recommend to publish in the peer-reviewed section, recommend to publish in the peer-reviewed section after incorporating comments, recommend to publish in the non-peer-reviewed section, and do not recommend to publish at all.

In case of different opinions of the reviewers, a third review might to be conducted.

The authors are informed by the editors of the results of the reviewers' evaluation and are invited to address their comments.

In the second round of peer review, the reviewers assess how the authors' comments have been incorporated. In case of their positive opinion, the review procedure is terminated with positive result.

The Editorial Board uses the results of the peer review process to decide whether to include the article in the peer-reviewed part of the journal.

Articles offered or commissioned for the section "From the theses of our students" and the non-reviewed section are assessed by the Editor-in-Chief in terms of factual correctness, content consistency with the focus of the journal and expertise. In his /her assessment, he/she observes the principles of fairness, objectivity, impartiality and uniformity. If necessary, he/she shall consult the article with the members of the Editorial Board.

The content of each issue is approved by the Editorial Board.